A U.S. district court judge ruled Wednesday that the state of North Dakota is entitled to nearly $28M from the federal government for responding to protests of Energy Transfer's (NYSE:ET) Dakota ...

No enforcement actions were launched in March, the first time in the 20-year history of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials ...

North Dakota lawsuit to recoup policing costs ... the District of Columbia Circuit on Wednesday sided with pipeline owner Energy Transfer to keep oil flowing while the environmental review is ...

A major flashpoint for those conflicts was the Dakota Access Pipeline, in which Energy Transfer owns a 38.2% stake, during its construction in 2016 and 2017. However, the Trump Administration ...

trespass and nuisance against Energy Transfer, the owner of the Dakota Access Oil Pipeline, and ordered the environmental nonprofit to pay a staggering $660 million, threatening to send it into ...

BISMARCK, N.D. — A federal judge on Wednesday found the state of North Dakota ... pipeline carries roughly 5% of the United States' daily oil production. In 2017, the pipeline company, Energy ...

April 10, 2025 Energy ... a Texas-based pipeline company nearly $667 million in damages for the environmental advocacy group’s role in 2016-2017 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline ...

A federal judge has ruled that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers must pay $28 million to the state of North Dakota ... gas company and pipeline developer and operator Energy Transfer provided ...

Dakota Access ... to protest the energy project. A spokesman said it was not related to President-elect Donald Trump's investments in a partnership building the $3.8 billion pipeline.

A U.S. district court judge ruled Wednesday that the state of North Dakota is entitled ... for responding to protests of Energy Transfer's (NYSE:ET) Dakota Access oil pipeline in 2016-17.

BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday found the state of North Dakota entitled to nearly $28 million for ...