Antitrust advocates rejoice at the second decision against the $1.8 trillion behemoth in less than a year. The Washington Monthly is an independent voice, listened to by insiders and willing to take ...

The Business Council contends the 21st Century Antitrust Act ... to industries already regulated by the federal Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, which bans monopolization or attempts at monopolizing ...

The US Department of Justice is now moving on to the remedy phase in the ongoing Google antitrust saga, and it is now looking for ways to change the company's practices. One of the solutions that ...

It lost the liability phase of this trial resoundingly, with the court finding Google violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by "willfully acquiring and maintaining monopoly power." As far as the ...

For the FTC to win its monopolization claim, brought under Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, it must prove Meta monopolizes the personal social networking market and alleged monopolization ...

But Trump’s gripes with Big Tech have always been about its treatment of him, not about a principled commitment to a robust interpretation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. In fact, the president ...

Google violated the Sherman Antitrust Act “by willfully acquiring and maintaining monopoly power” in the online technology ad industry, the court said. We are having trouble retrieving the ...

April 23 (UPI) --The European Commission on Wednesday fined Apple and Meta $570.85 million and $228.34 million, respectively for breach of the EU Digital Markets Act. The actions against the tech ...

or any other combination or conspiracy having a similar purpose or effect in violation of” the Sherman Antitrust Act. The tiff between Compass and NWMLS began escalating earlier this spring when ...

Gov. Jeff Landry called for stricter regulations on the insurance industry, suggesting the governor is staking his political ...

Tom Brenner for The New York Times The F.T.C.’s argument hinges on Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, which forbids a company to maintain a monopoly through anticompetitive practices.