My post on Judge Kollar-Kotelly’s silly order in a prosecution under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act ... to places of religious worship. Specifically, subsection 248(a)(2) makes ...

The petitions filed have challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991, which it said violates the principles of secularism ...

The petitions had challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 2, 3, 4 of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991, which they said violates the principles of secularism and rule ...

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear on Tuesday a plea challenging the validity of a provision of the Places ... of a place of worship. It has challenged section 4(2) of the Act that barred ...

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to entertain a new petition challenging the Places of Worship ... of a place of worship. It has challenged section 4(2) of the Act that barred proceedings ...

In his petition, Upadhyay has sought a directive allowing courts to determine the original religious character of a place of worship and has specifically challenged Section 4(2) of the Act ...

Many of these legal cases cite an exception within the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act of 1991, which was meant to freeze the religious status of all places of worship as they existed a ...